Feds: Yale Discriminates Against Asian American and White Applicants

Avatar

Andrew Donaldson

Born and raised in West Virginia, Andrew has since lived and traveled around the world several times over. Though frequently writing about politics out of a sense of duty and love of country, most of the time he would prefer discussions on history, culture, occasionally nerding on aviation, and his amateur foodie tendencies. He can usually be found misspelling/misusing words on Twitter @four4thefire and his writing website Yonderandhome.com

Related Post Roulette

47 Responses

  1. Avatar DavidTC
    Ignored
    says:

    A reminder: 12% of Yale students are legacy.

    Aka, about 700 of them.

    Sorta puts that ‘rejects scores of Asian American and white applicants each year based on their race, whom it otherwise would admit’ in perspective, doesn’t it?

    Yeah, it might reject ‘scores’ of qualified white applications. It also might pick _hundreds_ of unqualified white applications because their parents and grandparents attended Yale. Some of who literally were attending while the school was segregated.Report

    • Avatar DavidTC in reply to DavidTC
      Ignored
      says:

      Oh, and another reminder: Legacy admissions basically exist to keep to Jews out of elite schools. That was their origin, literally to keep minorities out of the schools. Schools found the ‘Jewish quota’, the amount of Jews they were willing to admit, less and less defensible, so invented legacy admissions.

      The minorities being kept out has changed a bit, but it’s the same principle.

      Affirmative action tries to undo the mistakes of the past by giving traditionally discriminated again groups a slight advantage. Whether or not people think this is justifiable is debatable. It’s possible it’s not a good idea. I’ve never liked it, mostly because college is actually way too late in the process to fix educational issues.

      But having people complaining about _that_ while just blithely accepting the much larger system of legacy admissions that was literally built to give advantage to traditionally _privileged_ groups and lock out minorities, and still mostly manages that, is absurd.Report

    • Avatar CJColucci in reply to DavidTC
      Ignored
      says:

      Although the legacy admits may not be the best as these things are generally measured, Yale, like all other top-tier colleges, has so many more highly-qualified applicants than it can take that it could dispense with the admissions bureaucracy, draw the names out of a hat (maybe after culling the least promising 10% or so), and almost nobody would notice in practice any difference in the quality of the entering class. The ethnic and class composition of the entering class would be whatever it was, nobody could yell about discrimination, educational standards would be maintained, and the disappointed aspiring Eli might end up at Old Nassau or NYU, with little genuine reason to complain.Report

  2. Avatar Stillwater
    Ignored
    says:

    Yale’s admission standards just got cancelled.

    Here’s the breakdown:

    The enrolled student population at Yale University is 44.3% White, 13.9% Asian, 9.4% Hispanic or Latino, 5.67% Black or African American, 4.76% Two or More Races, 0.324% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 0.108% Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islanders.

    why doesn’t that add uo to 100%…Report

  3. Avatar Brandon Berg
    Ignored
    says:

    It would be interesting to see an admissions equivalency chart. Like, take the academic record of the median black HYPS admit. At what schools do the median Asians have similar records?Report

  4. Avatar Oscar Gordon
    Ignored
    says:

    How does HYPS compare to HBCU?Report

  5. Avatar Philip H
    Ignored
    says:

    Trump’s 2020 America – Where making Yale white again is a way better use of DoJ time then actually keeping polling places open in minority communities or keeping police from killing a man over a fake $20.Report

    • Avatar Jaybird in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      Personally, I think that legalizing marijuana would fix *SO* many problems across the board. Policing, job discrimination, and stuff down the road too. I can’t believe that the House hasn’t put forward a bill yet.Report

      • Avatar Philip H in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        the War on Drugs has been a dismal success in as much as it has destroyed inner cities in exactly the way it was hoped. Legalizing marijuana would indeed solve a great many problems – including tax revenue sources (See Colorado); so would retooling cocaine sentences so that they are proportional to the crime, not more lenient by form of cocaine consumed.Report

      • Avatar Saul Degraw in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        Yes. We know this is your pet issue. So much so that you can’t comprehend people with other priorities, ranked priorities, different priorities, etc. It is a monomania for you.Report

        • Avatar Jaybird in reply to Saul Degraw
          Ignored
          says:

          I thought we were taking turns talking about what we’d rather talk about.Report

        • Avatar Oscar Gordon in reply to Saul Degraw
          Ignored
          says:

          Do you understand why the Drug War matters in this?Report

          • Avatar Saul Degraw in reply to Oscar Gordon
            Ignored
            says:

            In this case, no.

            This is a thread about the DOJ stating that Yale discriminates against Whites and Asians. This is a claim that has been tried and failed against Harvard. It is also patently false based on the demographics.

            So it is about the ongoing white supremacy and racial resentment of the Trump admin. Jaybird launches into his monomania.Report

            • Avatar Stillwater in reply to Saul Degraw
              Ignored
              says:

              So it is about the ongoing white supremacy and racial resentment of the Trump admin.

              The argument that race quotas and other admissions criteria at elite schools discriminate against whites, and especially asians, has been circulating for at least decade. So linking this ruling back to Trump and white supremacy requires argument. I ask this seriously: do you want to make that argument?Report

              • Avatar Chip Daniels in reply to Stillwater
                Ignored
                says:

                I don’t have a strong opinion about this Yale case or not, but note how fluid racial categories are where Asians are variously white or nonwhite depending on the circumstances, similar to Saul and Lee’s observations that Jews occupy some gray zone in between white and off-white.

                My parochial and anecdotal sense is that in a highly European group, Asians are off-white, then in an integrated group with Africans and dark skinned people Asians become white.

                Sort of like how cream becomes either a neutral background or accent color depending on the carpet.Report

              • Avatar LeeEsq in reply to Chip Daniels
                Ignored
                says:

                A couple of years ago there was a very big debate on diverse the tech industry. There might not be that many African-Americans or Hispanic-Americans but you have lots of Asian-Americans and Asian immigrants. The issue seemed to be whether a high percentage of Asians was enough to make Silicon Valley diverse or do you need more Black people and Hispanics.

                I think that in certain Intersectionality corners, people of color really means of African, Indigenous American or Australian, or Hispanic descent. Asians are kind of color, especially if they are Muslims from the Indian subcontinent, but not really of color the way the above groups would be.Report

              • Avatar Stillwater in reply to LeeEsq
                Ignored
                says:

                I think that in certain Intersectionality corners, people of color really means…

                Intersectionality is limited to the intersecting properties of *oppressed* people(s) in specific contexts.. So skin color alone isn’t determinative.Report

              • Avatar InMD in reply to LeeEsq
                Ignored
                says:

                All I can say is this racial taxonomy stuff is messed up. Reminds me of this Report

              • Avatar Stillwater in reply to InMD
                Ignored
                says:

                That’s a pretty funny video. (and should be required viewing)Report

              • Avatar InMD in reply to Stillwater
                Ignored
                says:

                The most ridiculous thing is it doesn’t even need to exaggerate or follow anything to Its logical conclusion to get the result.Report

              • Avatar Stillwater in reply to Chip Daniels
                Ignored
                says:

                How is the helpful in answering the question I asked Saul?Report

              • Avatar Chip Daniels in reply to Stillwater
                Ignored
                says:

                Did you mean to say –
                “Yale is discriminating against whites, especially Asians”
                or
                “Yale is discriminating against Asians, not whites.”?

                Honestly I don’t care one way or the other. Just noting how the category becomes fluid and contextual, at the convenience of whatever point is desired.

                Maybe the larger point is that the boundary of “White Enough” are weaponized in service to whatever group wants to gain advantage sort of like an awful version of Dave Chappelle’s ethnic draft where an Asian is drafted into the White Army to drive out the Blacks, but then the moment the threat is past, is pushed out of the gates as well, and everyone starts giving side eye to the Jew.Report

              • Avatar ozzzy! in reply to Chip Daniels
                Ignored
                says:

                Not that you should necessarily care, but this doesn’t clear anything up for me to understand what you mean. I can read the words, so I know what you have said, but I assume this has some more to it than the words here in your mind?Report

              • Avatar ozzzy! in reply to Chip Daniels
                Ignored
                says:

                I’m lost with this comment – I really have no idea what any of this means, or even what I think it maybe, sort of could mean, for you. Are we talking parisian or hamburgian euro group?Report

            • Avatar Jaybird in reply to Saul Degraw
              Ignored
              says:

              I’d just like to point out that my marijuana policy comment was responding to a comment that was discussing Trump’s inability to keep the cops that killed George Floyd under control.Report

            • Avatar Oscar Gordon in reply to Saul Degraw
              Ignored
              says:

              One of the reasons certain minorities have a problem accessing the Ivies (or Higher Ed in general) is because drug convictions impact student aid eligibility. Factor this against how often minorities are convicted for minor drug offense via a plea deal, and you have large demographics getting cut out of the aid pipeline.Report

      • Avatar LeeEsq in reply to Jaybird
        Ignored
        says:

        You realize that there are international treaties that the control a lot of these things, so the House just can’t pass a bill without renegotiating treaties. You also realize that said bill would not even make it on the Senate floor. I’m not even seeing how legalizing marijuana is going to be the magical bullet solution. It certainly wasn’t in the states that past it.Report

        • Avatar Jaybird in reply to LeeEsq
          Ignored
          says:

          While I am more than happy to acknowledge that we have to keep arresting BIPOC and LGBTQQIIAAPDM+ people for smoking marijuana because we have international treaties, I’m still kind of shocked that people are willing to defend the status quo because changing it would be difficult.

          Or, hell, make grand sweeping gestures that could then be proven hollow by Cocaine Mitch killing it in the Senate.

          Or, hell, make the DOJ come out and say something official!

          Like they did about Yale.Report

        • Avatar Stillwater in reply to LeeEsq
          Ignored
          says:

          I’m not even seeing how legalizing marijuana is going to be the magical bullet solution.

          Who said ending the Drug War was a magic bullet solution to social problems? Has anyone *ever* said this?

          You realize that there are international treaties that the control a lot of these things

          Everyone who’s thought about the issue for more than a few minutes knows that international treaties come into play, but you reverse the causality here. The Treaties don’t “control” what happens domestically, and insofar as they create an obstacle to better domestic policy they should be scrapped and re-written.Report

          • Avatar LeeEsq in reply to Stillwater
            Ignored
            says:

            Jaybird above practically said it is a magic bullet even if he didn’t use that word.
            “Personally, I think that legalizing marijuana would fix *SO* many problems across the board. Policing, job discrimination, and stuff down the road too. I can’t believe that the House hasn’t put forward a bill yet.”

            Legalize marijuana and everything like police brutality, job discrimination, and more will magically mystically solve themselves.Report

    • Avatar George Turner in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      You have it backwards. The DOJ is filing these lawsuits because it is Yale that is determined to keep Yale white. Liberal elites are very protective of their elite and privileged positions.Report

      • Avatar Philip H in reply to George Turner
        Ignored
        says:

        Well the the DoJ got it really wrong since their action claims that whites have been discriminated against in admissions.Report

        • Avatar George Turner in reply to Philip H
          Ignored
          says:

          The DOJ is claiming that the discrimination was against Asians, in an action filed by Asians. Whites are only affected insofar as they’d never get into Yale with comparable test scores as some other groups that Yale racially favors.

          But of course Democrats will bend over backwards to argue in support of racial discrimination. Heck, some progressive universities are even mandating racially segregated orientation classes now. Kamala Harris’s kids probably find that confusing because they’re Swedish Americans.Report

    • Avatar Anthony in reply to Philip H
      Ignored
      says:

      Making Yale stop discriminating by race will probably not increase the percentage of white students very much, but it will increase the number of Asian-American students substantially. That was the result in California when Prop 209 went into effect and the UC admissions departments hadn’t figured out more subtle ways of discriminating on the basis of race.Report

  6. Avatar Saul Degraw
    Ignored
    says:

    The GOP march into racial resentment and white grievance continues apace.Report

      • Avatar greginak in reply to Damon
        Ignored
        says:

        I looked at that piece. “Summit News”. Why would the local paper of Summit County in CO being talking about this??? Oh i see this Summit News is something else.

        There is no information about who they are or who owns them. No background on this pub at all. Interesting. Every story is red for conservatives: “virtue signaling”, pro-trump stories and anti Dem stuff.

        Fine if that is what you are into. But not exactly something that anyone should trust w/o knowing anything about them and it clearly set up to get conservatives riled and give ammo for throwing out links on threads.Report

    • Avatar North in reply to Saul Degraw
      Ignored
      says:

      Eh, conservatives have a pretty strong case when we’re talking about race based affirmative action. And since when did Asian count as white?Report

      • Avatar Brandon Berg in reply to North
        Ignored
        says:

        Most of the evidence for white privilege is outcome-based. White people earn more money than black people. We do better on standardized tests. We’re admitted to elite universities at higher rates (though some AA hard enough to prevent this). We live longer. We’re arrested, incarcerated, and killed by police at lower rates. And so forth.

        By all of these standards, Asians are doing even better than non-Hispanic whites. In fact, on some of these metrics the Asian-white gap is as large as the white-black gap. If Asians weren’t white, it would seriously fish up the Narrative. So they’re white.Report

      • Avatar Saul Degraw in reply to North
        Ignored
        says:

        No, they don’t. This is another variant of bad faith trolling from conservatives and generally most of them probably think fewer black and brown people should go to college. The new attack against AOC is also that her GPA is not good. This is rich considering that Trump is probably a functional illiterate with zero intellectual curiosity.

        They are bad faith trolls and nothing more. They provide no evidence of correctness or sincerity. Any thing that says whites are discriminated against in college admissions is a dictionary definition of trolling.

        This is the crowd that spent years attacking Barack Obama with claims that he was only admitted to Harvard Law and got to the Law Review because of diversity. Now the attack is on AOC. Meanwhile, they seem fine with the fact that Biden went to Syracuse for Law School which is a much less prestigious school than Harvard Law.Report

        • Avatar North in reply to Saul Degraw
          Ignored
          says:

          None of that is germane to race based affirmative action. I, personally, am not convinced that race based affirmative action is bad policy but the left should view it as the danger it is. It is treating people differently because of race no matter how one slices it.

          In my opinion race based AA should be treated like radioactive chemotherapy. It IS a poison. Maybe we can use it to cure a bigger ill but it should be used gingerly, cautiously and with a solid plan to not use it indefinitely.Report

        • Avatar Anthony in reply to Saul Degraw
          Ignored
          says:

          UC has settled numerous cases with Asian applicants for discriminating against them. They have the legal and political firepower to defeat anyone in court if the facts are on their side; settling out of court is pretty much proof that they’re guilty.

          Given the absolute lack of intellectual diversity among university presidents and admissions officers, it’s pretty clear that the only way elite colleges keep Asian percentages as low as they are is by actively discriminating against Asians.

          Your ad-hominem attacks on Trump’s intelligence and education clearly show that you don’t have an actual case to make.Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *